This article has been authored by Richard Simmons, MOI Global instructor and senior portfolio manager with Credo Group. Richard is based in London.
When I was a teenager a family connection lead me to spend a good deal of time in the courts. Eventually I came to work there in the school holidays, working as a solicitor’s clerk, sitting behind the barristers, supposedly to “take a note” but none of my notes were ever consulted. The barrister was not supposed to talk to the client without a solicitor’s clerk present and I was the cheapest form of chaperone. So I spent many days sitting through criminal trials with nothing else to do but pay attention to the evidence, the process and the many interesting parties – the police, judges, juries and criminals – brought to that place. Trials would last for days or weeks but they were always fascinating. As the case neared its conclusion, with prosecuting and defence barristers making their closing arguments, the judge summing up and the jury sent into cloister there was a rising tension in the room. Everyone would hang around until the usher hurried in to announce that the jury had reached their verdict. Then, like in the last scene of an Agatha Christie novel, everyone reassembled to hear if the defendant had dunnit.
The tension is all in that moment. What would it be, freedom or ten years in jail? My mind would race through the evidence and the arguments, trying to guess what the jury would decide. Both barristers had made good cases. There was always some doubt. So the verdict, when it came, always seemed arbitrary. Worse, if it was guilty, the judge always sounded so certain in the homily that accompanied the sentence. You are a bad man, you have done a wicked thing. How could they be so sure when a moment ago no one knew anything? That was the whole point of the proceedings, of course, to sound certain, to give finality. We were there precisely to decide guilt and any uncertainty that remained undermined the system.
The law, sports, and history itself, are all lived forward and only understood backwards, at the end. Stocks, too. Every thesis, every analysis rendered redundant by the facts. But this is a perfectly useless philosophy in practice and it deserves to be reversed: life may be reviewed as a whole backwards but can only be experienced forward. Stocks will ultimately be accounted on sale but can only be assessed on purchase.
It is what it is: we shall be judged by our fruits but we cannot know them until it is too late. So we reach for what is available, heuristics, rules of thumb, annual reports, broker research, ratios. This stock is trading at a multiple of 15 but the sector is at 20, so maybe it will catch up. This stock has insider sales so we sell. All of these techniques are, in our opinion, ways to avoid the most difficult task an investor must undertake: to predict the future.
We make estimates, provisions, calculate intrinsic value and design elaborate models; but what you most need to know is whether you are moving in the right direction. How? Here is a good exercise: For a given company you follow, close your eyes and imagine what it will look like in ten years’ time. If the answer is “no idea” you probably don’t know the company well enough to invest in it. If the answer is “much the same as today”, all of the value will be in the price. You might pay a P/E of five because you believe the right number is ten, so gains will be on revaluation and any growth in the company itself is incidental. And if the answer is “I don’t know but it will be certainly be a lot more profitable”, then the math may be trickier but your price will not be geared to what other people think but to that profitable future. This is where most gains are made in stock investing.
A neurologist will tell you that the brain is a machine for making predictions. All sensory data is compared not just to memories but to our working model of what we believe will happen next.
Investing, if it is to be done well, does not depend on only looking backwards but harnesses that brain power and develops our gift for looking into the unknown and making it knowable.
Important information note: The content of this promotion has been approved by Credo Capital Plc which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom and is a member of the London Stock Exchange. Investors are warned that past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance, income is not guaranteed, share prices may go up or down and you may not get back the original capital invested. The value of your investment may rise or fall due to changes in tax and rates of exchange if different to the currency in which you measure your wealth. Investment in the fund is not available in the US or to US persons. It is only suitable for professional, high net worth and sophisticated clients as set out in COBS 4.12 of the FCA handbook. If you do not meet these criteria you must not place reliance on this document and will not be eligible to invest in the fund. This document has been created for information purposes only and has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable. None of Credo, Derby street or their directors, officers or employees accepts liability or for any loss arising from the use here of or reliance hereon or for any act or omission by such person, or makes any representations as to its accuracy and completeness. No part of this report may be reproduced or distributed in any manner without the written permission of Credo. No investment in the Fund should be considered without reading the prospectus in relation thereto and in particular the risk warnings contained therein.
About The Author: Richard Simmons
Richard Simmons joined Credo as an Investment Manager in 2001. He
discretionarily invests managed accounts and is the Investment Adviser
of a Cayman fund, Derby Street Investments. Before becoming an
investment manager he was a banker for eleven years. He was educated
at Oxford and Cass Business School and is the author of "Buffett Step
by Step".
More posts by Richard Simmons