The Walt Disney Company: Streaming Service to Widen Moat

June 27, 2018 in Audio, Communication Services, Diary, Entertainment, Equities, GARP, Ideas, Large Cap, North America, Transcripts, Wide Moat, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018 Featured

Francisco Olivera of Arevilo Capital Management presented his in-depth investment thesis on The Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS) at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

Thesis summary:

The Walt Disney Company is a premier global media and entertainment company primarily focused on branded intellectual property and licensed sports content. Disney is able to monetize its IP at a high and sustainable rate by leveraging its content across movie theatres, home video, theme parks, consumer products, and live entertainment.

This strategy has built and constantly widened Disney’s moat, but the moat can be extended further when Disney launches its own streaming service. At 16x earnings, investors can purchase a great business at a good price.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Francisco M. Olivera is the Co-Founder and President of Arevilo Capital Management, an $11 million private investment fund. Arevilo was founded in 2014 with the goal of successfully investing in businesses by taking concentrated positions (10-25% of capital) with long-term holding periods (5-10+ years). From 2011 to 2013, Francisco worked as an analyst in J.P. Morgan’s Financial Sponsor Group within the investment banking division. Francisco received his BS from Bentley University in 2011.

Charter: Fears of Slowdown in Core Broadband Business Overblown

June 27, 2018 in Audio, Communication Services, Equities, GARP, Ideas, Jockey Stocks, Large Cap, Media, North America, Special Situations, Wide Moat, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018

Patrick Brennan of Brennan Asset Management presented his in-depth investment thesis on Charter Communications (Nasdaq: CHTR) at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

Thesis summary:

Charter Communications is the second-largest U.S. cable company with 27+ million customers at the end of Q1 2018. The shares have sold off in 2018 as investors fear a slowing in the core broadband business, the impact of video cord-cutting, and the arrival of 5G fixed wireless, which some worry could be a potential competitor to cable’s core broadband business. Considering the nearly 50% DSL overlap in CHTR’s market, the core broadband business still has multiple years of growth.

While video losses could negatively impact top-line growth, the FCF impact will likely be more muted given the lower gross margin profile, higher cost to service video customers and larger amount of video capex spend. While there are questions about whether there is a reasonable business case for 5G fixed wireless, at worst its impact is likely to be most acute in the largest metropolitan markets where CHTR is underrepresented.

Investors may be underestimating the leveraged equity return that ultimately transpires from a business that will likely generate 7-8% EBITDA growth over the next 3-5 years, maintain leverage at 4-4.5x, pay little in cash taxes, and conceivably repurchase 40-50% of outstanding shares.

By purchasing shares in Liberty Broadband (LBRDK) and GCI Communications (GLIBA), investors can conceivably generate 20+% IRRs by buying already-cheap CHTR shares at “double discounts” as the two Liberty names trade 10-20% below net asset value.

About the instructor:

Patrick Brennan is the founder and portfolio manager of Brennan Asset Management, a Registered Investment Advisory firm based in Napa, CA, which utilizes a concentrated value investing strategy. Patrick has given presentations at multiple value investing conferences, including presentations to The New York Society of Security Analysts (NYSSA), The Nebraska Society of Securities Analysts and presentations on various names at the VALUEx Vail Conferences. Patrick coauthored an article on tracking stocks with Lawrence Cunningham for The Financial History Magazine and Patrick was featured in a write-up of Liberty LILAK in The Private Investment Brief. Prior to founding Brennan Asset Management, Patrick managed portfolios and led research efforts at two value investing firms in California: Hutchinson Capital Management and RBO & Co. Previously, Patrick worked at Mark Boyar & Company, where he led the firm’s research team and helped manage $800 million of assets across individual portfolios, institutional accounts and a mutual fund. Patrick also worked for six years in investment banking and equity research with Deutsche Bank, CIBC World Markets and William Blair & Company. Patrick graduated summa cum laude from the University of Notre Dame with a degree in economics and was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa. Patrick received the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation in 2002 and is a member of the CFA Institute (formerly AIMR). Patrick is originally from Omaha, Nebraska.

Members, log in below to access the restricted content.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

Case Studies: The Power of a Low-Cost Advantage

June 27, 2018 in Audio, Case Studies, Commentary, Diary, Equities, Large Cap, North America, Wide Moat, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018 Featured

Phil Ordway of Anabatic Investment Partners shared his research and insights into the “power of a low-cost advantage” at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

Overview of Phil’s session:

A competitive advantage can come in many different flavors, but my favorite might be a low-cost advantage. I don’t think it’s necessarily better than others, but for me it’s easier to understand. A low-cost advantage can also be best exploited by one of my own areas of strength: patience.

An underlying premise here is that the world is competitive; I think the rumors of the death of capitalism are premature, and I see vicious competition in almost every business I come across. In these competitive fights there are few better allies to have than a low-cost advantage. Put differently, high costs – or even just an industry-average cost structure – can create serious impediments to success. Suffering less and avoiding failure can turn a prosaic business into a great success.

Some of the companies I most admire use a low-cost business model to create a virtuous feedback loop with volumes: low costs enable low prices; low prices generate high volumes; high volumes allow lower costs; lower costs are reinvested in lower prices; on and on we go. The best companies take this feedback loop and combine it with other hallmarks of “wide moat” companies – stellar customer service, notable brands/loyalty, strong network effects, effective capital allocation, etc. – to get exceptional and durable long-term results.

As noted in our 2017 letter to partners, history offers many examples of business success that was derived partially or mostly from a low-cost advantage:

Ford – The Model T changed the world with its efficient manufacturing approach, enabling a low-price product that was accessible to the masses.

McDonald’s – Real estate played a big role, but without a standardized, low-cost approach and low-price menu there would be no McDonald’s.

Sears – Before Amazon there was Sears and its low-cost catalog sales model that revolutionized the retail industry.

GEICO – Realizing that car insurance is both required and commodity-like, GEICO has been ruthless in exploiting its low-cost, direct-to-consumers approach.

Walmart – Sam Walton is perhaps the best-known example of a low-cost advantage being scaled up to massive effect.

IKEA – A simple warehouse with cheap, self-assembled furniture is now among the leading retailers (and brands) in the world.

Costco – Sol Price’s low-cost warehouse model was perfected at Costco, a company famous for reinvesting every last nickel of cost savings back into a virtuous loop of low prices and higher volumes. The annual membership fee (later copied by Amazon Prime) is also an important wrinkle that further enables low prices.

Nucor – Steel production is a brutal industry, but Nucor rode its low-cost “mini-mill” strategy to great success.

Southwest – Over more than 40 years Southwest has exploited its low-cost advantage to post an unbroken string of profits while many of its competitors withered and died. Ryanair took Southwest’s low-cost approach to the next level in Europe.

The Home Depot – After a successful stint running a leading home improvement chain, Blank and Marcus asked themselves a simple question: What kind of home improvement store could we not compete against? A big, no-frills, low-cost/low-price warehouse.

Wells Fargo – An efficient, low-cost deposit gathering machine is very tough to beat.

Amazon – The modern paragon of success, Amazon has low costs – and the reinvestment of those low costs – at the core of everything it does.

Vanguard – Aided by lean operations and its ownership structure, the low-cost index fund has made an enormous impact on the investment world.

Even if we accept the idea that history has proven low-cost business models to be successful, does that mean the future will offer similar rewards? Only time will tell, but I think the odds are favorable. I make an ongoing study of many of these companies and believe several of them are worthwhile investments.

Some current examples of companies/industries with a low-cost advantage that may be worth further consideration include:

– ultra-low-cost carriers (airlines);
– building products companies;
– industrial distributors;
– software companies;
– and financial intermediaries.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Philip Ordway is Principal and Portfolio Manager of Anabatic Fund, L.P. Previously, Philip was a partner at Chicago Fundamental Investment Partners (CFIP). At CFIP, which he joined in 2007, Philip was responsible for investments across the capital structure in various industries. Prior to joining Chicago Fundamental Investment Partners, Philip was an analyst in structured corporate finance with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. from 2002 to 2005, where he was part of a team responsible for identifying financing solutions for companies initially in the global power and utilities group and ultimately in the global autos and industrials group. Philip earned his M.B.A. from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University in 2007 and his B.S. in Education & Social Policy and Economics from Northwestern University in 2002.

OTC Markets: Small-Equities Market with Owner-Operator CEO

June 27, 2018 in Audio, Communication Services, Equities, Financials, GARP, Ideas, North America, Small Cap, Wide Moat, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018 Featured

Chris Crawford of Crawford Fund Management presented his in-depth investment thesis on OTC Markets (OTC: OTCM) at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Chris Crawford is the Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer of Crawford Fund Management, LLC, a Boston-based Registered Investment Advisor. The firm manages a long/short fund that invests in equities and options with an emphasis on underfollowed public companies. Prior to co-founding Crawford Fund Management in 2009, Chris was Managing Director, Portfolio Manager and head of the Boston office with Stark Investments, a $10B multi-strategy global hedge fund. At Stark, Chris built the firm?s equity long/short team and managed $1.5B in equity long/short assets as well as a $200M short-biased portfolio. From 2003-2006, Chris was Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager with Putnam Investments, and co-Portfolio Manager of the $3B Putnam International Capital Opportunities Fund and related client accounts. From 2000 to 2003, Chris was a Partner and Senior Analyst with ABRY Partners on a team managing a $400M TMT-focused hedge fund. From 1996 to 2000, Chris was with Wellington Management Company, where he served as a Global Industry Analyst covering the media industry and as a Portfolio Manager for $600M in client sector-fund and institutional assets. Chris holds an MBA from The Wharton School of Business and graduated magna cum laude from University of Pennsylvania with a BA in Physics, BS in Economics, BAS in Systems Engineering and an MA in International Relations.

Middleby, Freshii: Two Restaurant-Related Ideas Led by Missionaries

June 27, 2018 in Audio, Communication Services, Consumer Discretionary, Equities, GARP, Ideas, Jockey Stocks, Micro Cap, Mid Cap, North America, Transcripts, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018 Featured

David Barr and Felix Narhi of PenderFund Management Capital presented their in-depth investment theses on Middleby (Nasdaq: MIDD) and Freshii (Toronto: FRII) at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

Thesis summaries:

Middleby: Since taking the helm in 2001, CEO Selim Bassoul and his management team have transformed the company from a small “me too” food equipment maker into one of the world’s largest commercial food equipment makers, with three synergistic platforms serving the restaurant industry, large commercial bakeries and meat producers, and consumers in search of premium kitchen appliances. The food equipment industry benefits from a number of structural shifts taking place at the consumer and restaurant operator level.

In addition to secular tailwinds, Middleby has an extraordinary track record outpacing the growth of the market through disruptive innovation and adding value via its proven M&A framework. David and Felix believe management’s enviable value creation algorithm remains intact. Proven compounders rarely trade at a discount to the market, but sporadic bumps in the road can push down stocks to compelling valuation levels.

Of late, investors have been concerned about the weak organic growth across all three core segments as well as the full price for a proposed large acquisition (Taylor), which will increase financial leverage. Due to negative investor sentiment, the stock recently traded near the same levels as four years ago, even though intrinsic value has grown much higher. Recent concerns should prove temporary and, from a long-term perspective, are more than adequately discounted in the stock.

Freshii is a founder-led restaurant concept that has delivered impressive metrics over its short history. The brand is at the forefront of the global health and wellness movement, pioneering the new “healthy fast food” category.

It has been one of the fastest-growing QSR brands in North America, both in terms of store count and same-store sales growth. The capital-light franchise model enables the company to use other people’s money to finance expansion and grab market share at a fast pace. Store growth is also driven by capital efficiency at the store level. As there is no expensive kitchen equipment, store build-out costs are modest relative to most other QSR concepts, which broadens the appeal of Freshii to franchise partners.

With modest capital intensity at the store level, partners have been able to earn attractive cash on cash returns of 30-40%. The opportunity is resonating with entrepreneurs. The brand receives more than 7,000 applications annually from franchises and opened 120 stores last year. The company went public in early 2017 with unrealistic expectations.

The stock plunged when the company reduced 2019 guidance later that year. As the underlying metrics of the business are still quite strong, the guidance miss was short-term in nature and a result of Corrin’s inexperience communicating with the capital markets rather than any meaningful business deterioration. It was a painful lesson.

Going forward, David and Felix anticipate Corrin will “underpromise and overdeliver.” Factoring in continued execution by a passionate owner-operator, a capital-light business model, and long-term growth ahead, the company is reasonably priced at less than 8x 2020E EBITDA, as compared to fast-growing U.S. comps Wing Stop and Shake Shack at over 20x. Freshii has a long runway ahead driven by the concept’s mass market appeal and founder Matthew Corrin’s ability to execute on his vision.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructors:

David Barr is the President and CEO of Pender. He is also the Portfolio Manager of several of Pender’s funds. The Pender Small Cap Opportunities Fund, managed by Mr. Barr, has won a Lipper Fund Award for Best Canadian Small/Mid Cap Fund over both three and five year performance periods for the last three consecutive years, 2015 to 2017. The Lipper awards recognize consistently strong, risk-adjusted performance relative to peers. The Fund has also received Fundata’s FundGrade® A+ Award for the last six consecutive years, 2012 to 2017. The Pender Value Fund, which he co-manages, has received Fundata’s FundGrade® A+ Award in 2016 and 2017. This award recognises funds that have maintained “an exceptional performance rating over the entire previous calendar year”. Mr. Barr began his investing career in 2000, initially working in private equity. He joined Pender in 2003, was appointed Chief Investment Officer in 2007, before becoming President and CEO of Pender in 2016. Mr. Barr holds an MBA from the Schulich School of Business and earned his Chartered Financial Analyst designation in 2003. Mr. Barr is an advocate of value investing as well as a true contrarian. He looks for value in unpopular places to find high quality businesses at a price that includes a “margin-of-safety”. Investing in a company trading below intrinsic value decreases the risk and increases the potential for generating significant long term performance.

Felix Narhi is the Chief Investment Officer of Pender and the Portfolio Manager of the Pender US All Cap Equity Fund and the Pender Strategic Growth and Income Fund, and Co-Manager of the Pender Value Fund. Prior to joining Pender in July 2013, Mr. Narhi spent over nine years at an independent and value-oriented investment firm in Vancouver. As a Director and Senior Equity Analyst, Mr. Narhi contributed thought leadership and primarily US equity ideas to the company’s Model Portfolio, a concentrated equity portfolio that has outpaced North American benchmarks since its inception in 1994. Mr. Narhi holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of British Columbia. He earned his Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation in 2003 and is a member of CFA Vancouver. Mr. Narhi advocates a business-like approach to investing. Sound investing is the process of determining the value underlying a security and then buying it at a considerable discount to that value. The greatest challenge is to maintain the necessary balance between patience, emotional fortitude and discipline to only buy when prices are attractive and to sell when they are dear, while avoiding the short-term “noise” that consumes most market participants.

5N Plus: Transforming to High-Value Materials Technology Company

June 27, 2018 in Audio, Equities, GARP, Ideas, Information Technology, Materials, Micro Cap, North America, Special Situations, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018 Featured

Shawn Kravetz of Esplanade Capital presented his in-depth investment thesis on 5N Plus (Canada: VNP) at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

Thesis summary:

5N Plus is the leading global supplier of niche specialty metals, chemicals, and engineered materials to the diverse end-markets in which it competes. Following the departure of the founding CEO in 2015, a new management team is transforming VNP from a struggling low-value-add metals pass-through business (high revenue with low margins) to a high-value-add (lower revenue with high margin) materials technology company. Based in Canada, this under-the-radar company is rich with catalysts, including imminent revenue inflection due to 3x growth at its largest customer (First Solar) and strong but masked top-line trends. The shares trade at ~7x/6x 2018/2019 consensus EBITDA, as compared to specialty metals peers at ~10x, with upward pressure on 2019 consensus estimates. Shawn sees 50/75% stock price appreciation potential in his base/upside case.

Listen to this session:

slide presentation audio recording

About the instructor:

Shawn Kravetz is President and Chief Investment Officer of Esplanade Capital LLC, an investment management company he founded in 1999. Esplanade Capital LLC manages capital for a small number of like-minded families, private investors, and institutions. Esplanade’s value orientation, driven by patient capital and proprietary research/analysis, has generated substantial outperformance versus benchmarks since inception. The firm specializes in smaller companies, out of favor & below the radar companies, special situations, and turnarounds. Prior to founding Esplanade, Shawn was a corporate executive and strategic advisor, including: Principal at The Parthenon Group, a leading strategy consulting boutique, where he advised chief executives on corporate strategy; Director of Strategic Planning and Corporate Development at The CML Group (NYSE traded), where he oversaw activities at subsidiaries including NordicTrack, The Nature Company, and Smith & Hawken; Consultant with Monitor Company, a leading strategy consulting firm. Shawn received an MBA with High Distinction from Harvard Business School in 1995, where he was awarded: The Thomas M. and Edna E. Wolfe Award; The Henry Ford II Scholar Award; and a Baker Scholarship. Shawn received an A.B. in Economics from Harvard University, magna cum laude, in 1991. Shawn has also been active in his community, having served as: Steering Committee Vice Chairman of The Museum of Fine Arts Council at The Museum of Fine Arts Boston and Member of the Steering Committee of The Vilna Center for Jewish Heritage. Shawn currently serves as Chairman of the Investment Committee at Temple Israel, Boston. Shawn currently serves on the board of directors of Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc. where he is Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee.

IAC/InterActiveCorp: Great Capital Allocator at Negative Stub Value

June 27, 2018 in Audio, Communication Services, Deep Value, Equities, Ideas, Interactive Media & Services, Jockey Stocks, Mid Cap, North America, Special Situations, Transcripts, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018 Featured

Elliot Turner of RGA Investment Advisors presented his in-depth investment thesis on IAC/InterActiveCorp (Nasdaq: IAC) at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

Thesis summary:

IAC/InterActiveCorp is a diverse holding company, incubator, and investor in Internet businesses created by Barry Diller. IAC trades at a discount to the value of its holdings in two publicly-traded subsidiaries (Match Group and ANGI Homeservices), implying a steeply negative market capitalization for the stub. The stub itself is a diverse mix of mature, highly cash-generative assets and young, rapidly scaling, cash-burning growth engines. The moat is derived from a culture and history of sharp business acumen, shared resources and lessons learned from building successful web companies to scale, and a sustainably lower cost of capital than competitors with a longer-term investment horizon. The stub benefits from a net cash position and should be worth, at a minimum, some number meaningfully greater than zero. IAC has several tools at its disposal to close the stub discount and will do so when the strategic timing is appropriate. Merely closing the gap would generate ~15% upside to shareholders in IAC. Meanwhile, each of the constituent parts continues to compound value, offering the potential for something far greater.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Elliot Turner is a co-founder and managing director at RGA Investment Advisors, LLC. RGA Investment Advisors runs a long-term, low turnover, growth at a reasonable price investment strategy seeking out global opportunities. Elliot focuses on discovering and analyzing long-term, high quality investment opportunities and strategic portfolio management. Prior to joining RGA, Elliot managed portfolios at at AustinWeston Asset Management LLC, Chimera Securities and T3 Capital. Elliot holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation as well as a Juris Doctor from Brooklyn Law School.. He also holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Emory University where he double majored in Political Science and Philosophy.

A Man + Machine Process for Identifying Businesses with Moats

June 25, 2018 in Diary, Equities, Wide Moat, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018 Featured

This article is authored by MOI Global instructor Luis Sanchez, Managing Partner of Overlook Rock Asset Management. Luis is an instructor at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

“The most important thing to me is figuring out how big a moat there is around the business. What I love, of course, is a big castle and a big moat with piranhas and crocodiles.” –Warren Buffett

A core strategy at Overlook Rock is investing in high quality businesses that may not trade at statistically cheap valuations but have the ability to compound at an above market rate for several years due to the existence of competitive advantages. Companies with sustainable competitive advantages are said to have a moat protecting their business from competition or other market forces, which can deliver significant value to shareholders over the long run.

Our research strongly convinced us that we could identify quality companies through a carefully reasoned and tested quantitative approach, enhanced with human oversight. As Michael Mauboussin noted, moats can be measured even if they cannot be simply explained.[1]

Overlook Rock’s “High Quality Company” investment strategy involves leveraging quantitative techniques to measure the “quality” of businesses. We also perform bottom-up analysis to understand why moats exist in the businesses we invest in.  Finally, we constantly monitor our portfolio companies for the persistence of their “quality” and react accordingly if moats deteriorate over time.

There are many potential sources of a business moat. Competitive advantages can include a strong brand, superior economies of scale, or exclusive legal rights, just to name a few. Regardless of the source of competitive advantage, the existence of a moat can be evidenced by strong financial results that persist over extended periods of time.

As a starting point in identifying moats, it is important to define operating metrics that matter. Business operating metrics can include anything from annual revenue growth to monthly active users. We have identified several key metrics that indicate effective use of resources to produce real profits and value for equity holders. These metrics draw upon a deep understanding of business fundamentals and are backed up by careful and rigorous historical analysis to prove the theory out.

In addition to maintaining healthy operating metrics, the consistency and persistence of those metrics is a positive indicator of quality. It is one thing for a company to post a strong year after a weak year. However, if a company consistently posts strong financial performance year after year and over an extended period of time, there are likely competitive advantages or favorable industry dynamics at play. Not every high quality company needs to show good results every year, but as a general rule of thumb the more consistent and persistent, the better.

Improving trends can be indicative of moat strengthening. If a company not only generates strong metrics but consistently shows improvement in the underlying metrics, it is a sign that a company may be widening the gap between itself and its competitors.

While any individual measurement described above may identify a potentially moaty business, a combination of multiple positive data points provides a more reliable indicator that a moat likely exists. Thus, using a robust multi-factor quantitative process can be more powerful in identifying potential investments than a simple screening tool.

Quantitative techniques can merely identify the existence of a moat but human analysts are needed to explain why the moat exists. A core belief at Overlook Rock is that models are imperfect. Quantitative techniques sometimes produce false positives due to certain factors that may be more easily understood by humans. Supporting quantitative methods with bottom-up research complements and strengthens our investment process.

A false positive could include a situation where the historical source of a moat is no longer present. For example, when drug patents expire at a pharmaceutical company, generic competitors enter markets and radically change the earnings power of legacy products. The understanding that a company is highly dependent on a few contractual rights that may expire is more easily attainable for a human analyst reading a 10K and speaking to a management team than an algorithm purely focused on financial figures.

A false positive could also include a situation where historical operating metrics require a reinterpretation. “Reinterpreting the past” can be tricky and requires walking a fine line, but in this context we focus on what non-quantifiable issues can fool a model. For example, are there accounting issues that over- or under-state key operating metrics? In the case of companies with complex capital structures, it can often be confusing to determine how much earnings are attributable to minority owners or even how much capital is being employed in an enterprise without a careful reading of the accounting footnotes. Even premier databases such as Compustat often get the numbers wrong in complex or obscure situations. Also, GAAP accounting rules can sometimes obscure the economic reality of a business.

In the context of Overlook Rock’s research process, our default stance is to invest in the recommendations generated by our High Quality Company model (among others). However, if the human analyst has found a potential pitfall in the High Quality model’s application to real world situations, we may avoid investing in a specific recommendation. We let our model do the heavy lifting by systematically identifying high quality businesses, while avoiding the few exceptions that may trick our model. This is akin to what Howard Marks refers to as the “negative art” of investing.[2]

[1] Michael Mauboussin, “Measuring the Moat”, 2013.
[2] Howard Marks, “The Most Important Thing”, 2011.

Compound Mispricings in Moated Businesses

June 21, 2018 in Diary, Equities, Wide-Moat Investing Summit, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018 Featured

This article is authored by MOI Global instructor by Keith Smith, Fund Manager of Bonhoeffer Fund. Keith is an instructor at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

“… if the market undervalues the derivative on a mispriced security or group of securities, the odds of the derivative investor can be very favorable. In effect, the investor benefits from the double leverage of two mispriced securities – the underlying and the derivative. Although such a situation doesn’t arise often, it can be particularly profitable. The ability to capture the compound mispricing can lead to extraordinary profits” – David Abrams1

Compound mispricings in moated businesses can create some interesting investment opportunities. Compound mispricings are situations where an underlying business is mispriced and a security in the firm’s capital structure or a third-party derivative is also mispriced. Non-voting common stock, holding company stock, warrants or LEAP’s are examples where derivative/security mispricing can occur.

There are various ways to analyze compound mispricings. One way involves comparing “look through” multiples of cash flows to other traded securities. The “look through” approach is the method Warren Buffet applies to cash flows from his investment portfolio holdings to assess the valuation of his portfolio. Another approach is to estimate the value of the underlying businesses and apply appropriate discounts at the security/derivative level. These discounts include: holding company costs, lack of marketability and lack of control (including voting) discounts for minority shareholders or costs associated with leverage in warrants or LEAPs.

Moated businesses are ideal compound mispricing candidates because the businesses are typically growing and are relatively immune from downward competitive shocks. In contrast, shrinking or competitively challenged businesses in combination with compound mispricings can lead to value traps. In these cases, the large discounts may be justified as the future value of the underlying firm will be lower. The challenge for declining businesses is determining the appropriate rate at which the business value will decline.

If the moated business has a shareholder oriented management team with improving governance, then the governance aspect of the discounts can also shrink as the market reflects improved governance. Management actions and communications can be a key catalyst to unlock compound mispricing discounts.

At Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018, I will describe compound mispricings, approaches to analyze compound mispricings and then examine two compound mispricings in moated businesses. I look forward to sharing my insights at Wide-Moat Investing Summit 2018.

1 Security Analysis, 6th edition by Benjamin Graham & David L. Dodd, page 621

MOI Global