Kering: Gucci Performance to Drive Turnaround at Luxury Goods Giant

January 12, 2024 in Audio, Best Ideas 2024, Diary, Discover Great Ideas Podcast, Equities, Ideas, Member Podcasts, Transcripts

Jean Pierre Verster of Protea Capital Management presented his investment thesis on Kering (France: KER) at Best Ideas 2024.

Thesis summary:

Kering is one of the largest personal luxury goods groups in the world, with a market cap of EUR ~55 billion. The company’s brand houses include Gucci, Saint Lauren, Bottega Veneta, Balenciaga, and Creed.

Kering was founded in 1962 by François Pinault as a timber trading company, and subsequently pivoted to retail, ultimately becoming a pure-play luxury goods group a decade ago.

The Paris-listed shares of Kering returned more than 27% annually from the end of 2013 to mid-2021 but have trended lower since then.

The group’s turnaround hinges to a large extent on Gucci’s performance over the next few years, as well as on economic recovery in China. Gucci’s new creative director, Sabato De Sarno, has an important role to play in Kering’s turnaround. Luxury is timeless, and Jean Pierre believes that Kering will stand the test of time.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Jean Pierre Verster is the founder and CEO of Protea Capital Management, an investment management firm headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa. The firm manages long-only equity portfolios as well as long/short equity hedge funds, investing globally. Jean Pierre serves as an independent non-executive director at Capitec Bank, the largest retail bank in South Africa by number of clients, where he was appointed chairman of the audit committee in 2015 for a 9-year term. Jean Pierre also serves on the Regulation Advisory Committee of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. He is a regular contributor in South Africa’s financial media across print, radio and television.

Card Factory: Well-Managed, High-ROIC Business With Two Catalysts

January 11, 2024 in Audio, Best Ideas 2024, Best Ideas 2024 Featured, Diary, Discover Great Ideas Podcast, Equities, Ideas, Member Podcasts, Transcripts

Mike Kruger of MPK Partners presented his in-depth investment thesis on Card Factory (UK: CARD) at Best Ideas 2024.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Mike Kruger’s first investment experience was watching his shares of Berkshire Hathaway get cut in half during the tech-mania of the late 1990’s. But he didn’t panic, and today manages a global focused value portfolio of equities and distressed debt in New York City. He previously worked as a former equity and credit analyst at Promethean Asset Management LLC in NYC, and prior to that as a high-yield credit analyst at Liberty Mutual in Boston. He holds a Bachelor’s degree from the College of Arts and Sciences at Cornell University.

Emergent BioSolutions: Distressed Debt Offers Attractive Risk-Reward

January 11, 2024 in Audio, Best Ideas 2024, Best Ideas 2024 Featured, Diary, Discover Great Ideas Podcast, Equities, Ideas, Member Podcasts

Parul Garg of PenderFund Capital Management presented her thesis on the fulcrum security of Emergent BioSolutions (US: EBS) at Best Ideas 2024.

Thesis summary:

Parul likes the risk-reward offered by the distressed first-lien term loan and unsecured bonds of Emergent BioSolutions, a U.S.-based specialty pharmaceutical company.

The term loan recently traded at 88 cents on the dollar, yielding 17% to maturity, while the unsecured bonds traded at less than 40 cents on the dollar, with a yield to maturity in excess of 27%.

While Emergent BioSolutions is a vital supplier to the U.S. government, it encountered operational challenges in 2022, particularly within its manufacturing division. Following a second round of cost cuts, the company is striving to achieve positive cash flow.

During the summer of 2023, Emergent BioSolutions introduced an over-the-counter (OTC) Narcan nasal spray, potentially transforming the landscape of opioid overdose prevention amid the ongoing North American opioid crisis.

With a revenue target of $1 billion and total debt in the capital structure amounting to ~$900 million, the company has recently drawn scrutiny with regard to the covenants on its senior credit facility.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Parul Garg joined Pender’s investment team in December 2015. She is currently the Associate Portfolio Manager for the Pender Corporate Bond Fund, which was recognized with a Lipper Fund Award in years 2018 and 2019. She covers all sub asset class in fixed income ranging from Investment Grade to Distressed credit. Her focus and expertise revolve around stressed and distressed credit. For the last 7 years, she has been involved in many credit workouts, pull to par, stressed debt exchanges, bankruptcy credits, restructuring, and recapitalizations.

Parul started her career as a Software Engineer with Accenture, focusing on projects in the financial domain. She then worked as a Fixed Income Derivative Analyst for two years at a private investment firm in India. She worked in Product Development with the Business Development Team for the Fixed Income Markets at the MCX Stock Exchange in India for a year and a half before moving to Vancouver in 2014 to start her MBA. Parul has a Bachelor of Technology in Civil Engineering from NIT Surat in India, a Master of Business Administration from the Beedie School of Business at Simon Fraser University and has completed CFA Level 1. In June 2022, she attended Warton School of Business (University of Pennsylvania) for Distressed Asset Investing and Corporate Restructuring course. She also sits on the Steering Committee for the Vancouver chapter of Women in Capital Markets.

G Mining Ventures: High FCF Likely After Near-Term Gold Mine Ramp-Up

January 10, 2024 in Audio, Best Ideas 2024, Diary, Discover Great Ideas Podcast, Equities, Ideas, Member Podcasts, Transcripts

Family office investor Samir Mohamed presented his investment thesis on G Mining Ventures (Canada: GMIN) at Best Ideas 2024.

Thesis summary:

G Mining Ventures is close to commercial production on a gold mine in Brazil, with projected all-in sustaining cost (AISC) of USD 681 per ounce, far below the industry average. The company reached 71% project completion in November 2023 and plans to start production in the second half of 2024. Franco Nevada, the biggest gold royalty and streaming company worldwide, is a major investor. The founder and CEO of GMIN is from a Canadian family with an excellent track record building large gold mines in South America.

Using a discounted cash flow model with the mine parameters forecasted by the company, a gold price of USD 2,000 per ounce and a 10% discount rate indicates 140% upside by H2 2024 at a closing share price of 1.38 CAD on December 18, 2023. Given the high free cash flow from its first mine and the option to use royalties or streams for financing, the company could add several more mines in five years without issuing more equity.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Samir Mohamed started with value investing in 1999 and manages a private family fund, full time since 2016. He focuses on good businesses with temporary problems and suppressed stock prices. Samir enjoys collaborating with other value investors regularly via in-person meetings or Zoom calls. He was global head of the product management teams of a 170 Mio. EUR industrial business at Siemens. He worked at Siemens for 13 years. Samir has a master’s degree in Management, Technology, and Economics and a bachelor’s degree in material science, both from ETH Zurich. He is based in Bangkok, Thailand.

North American Construction, Ashtead Group, Builders FirstSource

January 10, 2024 in Audio, Best Ideas 2024, Diary, Discover Great Ideas Podcast, Equities, Ideas, Member Podcasts, Transcripts

Keith Smith of Bonhoeffer Fund discussed the theme “Lollapalooza Effects of Scale, Consolidation, and Growth” at Best Ideas 2024.

Keith also presented his investment theses on North American Construction (US: NOA), Ashtead Group (UK: AHT), Builders FirstSource (US: BLDR).

Overview:

What are the characteristics of a good investment theme? First, the investments that are a part of the theme must generate an adequate expected return. In today’s interest rate environment, where an investor can obtain low teens expected returns from well underwritten first lien debt on a growing capital light firm, the expected returns need to be at least in the mid to high teens. Positive equity returns are generated from two sources:

1) from growth in underlying firm cash flows as a result of being internally re-invested, shares being repurchased or paid out as dividends, and

2) the increase in the cash flow valuation multiple the market applies to the cash flows.

The more predictable source is through growth as changes in cash flow multiples reflect the speculative element of market pricing. Therefore, in searching for higher expected returns, growth should carry most if not all the load. Lower multiples provide a margin of safety against multiple contraction and should not be relied upon to generate most of the return. If multiple expansion occurs, it is a bonus.

Another characteristic of a good investment theme is that it should be applicable to multiple industries and have generated excess returns in the past. Consolidation is one such theme. Over the past few years, a number of industries have gone through consolidation with economics of the leading firms in the industry getting better with time. In many cases, the valuation of these consolidating firms are based upon their historical performance and not their improving current and future performance. Thus, there is a lag associated with valuation multiple appreciation as well as cash flow appreciation. This can lead to a favorable situation where both cash flows and multiples increase at the same time. Three examples of the growth/consolidation theme are found in our subject companies (North American Construction, The Ashtead Group and Builders FirstSource).

Consolidation and organic growth are important sources of scale for many businesses. Evidence of scale is seen in higher margins and higher asset turns over time. Scale occurs primarily at either a local level (as in retailing businesses) or on a national level (as in consumer durables or staples). As a firm grows, bureaucracy can dilute the positive effects of scale. Scale can also enhance larger players’ moats, as the larger firms can afford technology to improve productivity, reduce bureaucracy and provide less costly and more timely products and services.

Consolidation can occur geographically or functionally along a value chain. If done geographically and if more synergies are realized locally than nationally, cluster or customer density are important. Generally, fragmented markets are consolidated via both organic growth (gaining market share) and consolidation. Depending upon the difficulty, cost and timing of gaining market share and the price of an M&A targets, many times M&A is a better approach to consolidation than organic growth.

An interesting question is where in the consolidation life cycle does it make sense to invest? In the emerging portion of the life cycle (the top firm have less than 1% of market share), many of the economies of scale and synergies are not reflected in the financials of the firm so the valuations are typically lower and potential for growth is higher. Specialization can create favorable economics in the emerging portion of the life cycle. Later on, in the consolidation lifecycle, the economies of scale and synergies are more evident in the financials, but the valuation is typically higher. Investing in these consolidation situations as they develop can benefit from an increase in business quality not reflected in the recent price. All of the firms examined below have expected equity returns of greater than 20%.

The first firm we will look at is North American Construction, which is specializing in mining construction services (including moving dirt and road construction and repair) in remote locations for both mining and infrastructure firms. This a nascent fragmented market in North America and Australia. The mining segment of the construction services market is fragmented with many players having less than 1% market share. NOA has developed operational key performance indicators (“KPI”)s (such as equipment utilization) to help estimate NOA’s return in invested capital (“RoIC”) for projects they bid on. These KPIs provide guidance on what projects to bid on. A few other high RoIC specialty construction services firms have recently emerged in Australia, namely Duratec and Mader, which also focus on specific segments of the construction services market. Beginning in oil sands construction services, NOA over time has expanded its functional footprint (into mine management services) and geographic footprint (into Australia). NOA’s management team has also used traditional capital allocation such as leverage and share buybacks to enhance shareholder returns over time.

The second firm is the Ashtead Group, which has historically rolled up and gained market share in the equipment rental market in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Equipment rental firms can achieve local economies of scale (clustering) through shared equipment pools (higher utilization), cross selling opportunities, technology automation and service opportunities. Ashtead uses a hybrid consolidation approach. Ashtead purchases firms providing new rental equipment types (such as cleaning equipment) or equipment rental firms in new geographic areas. Once a beachhead is established, Ashtead relies on organic growth for growth within a region or functional area. Ashtead has developed a nationwide distribution platform where new products and services can easily be distributed and provided to its customers. In addition, Ashtead’s management team has used traditional earnings growth techniques such as leverage and share buybacks when Ashtead’s stock price is low and there are no immediate consolidation opportunities available in the market.

The third firm is Builders FirstSource, which has rolled-up and gained market share across different segments and geographic regions for the supply of value-added building products and building product distribution across the United States. As a part of the roll-up process, BFS is increasing its total addressable market both geographically and via new product/service offerings. Like Ashtead, BFS has developed a nationwide distribution platform for the distribution of new value-added building products and services. BFS’ management team has also used traditional earnings growth techniques such as leverage and share buybacks when BFS’ stock price is low and there are no immediate consolidation opportunities available in the market.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Keith Smith, the fund manager, brings over 20 years of valuation experience to the Bonhoeffer Fund. He is a CFA charterholder and received his MBA from UCLA. Keith currently serves as a Portfolio Manager at Bonhoeffer Capital and was previously a Managing Director of a valuation firm and his expertise includes corporate transactions, distressed loans, derivatives, and intangible assets. Warren Buffett and Benjamin Graham’s value-oriented approach of pursuing the “fifty-cents on the dollar” opportunities, underpins Keith’s investment strategy. The combination of his experience and track record led Keith to commit most of his investable net worth to the Bonhoeffer Fund model.

Ferroglobe: Delevered, Growing, Structurally More Profitable

January 10, 2024 in Audio, Best Ideas 2024, Best Ideas 2024 Featured, Diary, Discover Great Ideas Podcast, Equities, Ideas, Member Podcasts, Transcripts

Kyle Mowery of GrizzlyRock Capital presented his in-depth investment thesis on Ferroglobe plc (US: GSM) at Best Ideas 2024.

The full session is available exclusively to members of MOI Global.

Members, log in below to access the full session.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the instructor:

Kyle Mowery is the founder and managing partner of GrizzlyRock Capital. Kyle holds an MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and a BA in Economics from UCLA. GrizzlyRock Capital is an alternative asset management firm seeking to deliver risk-managed returns to investors via opportunities across equity markets. The firm takes a value-investing approach to security selection, relying on rigorous fundamental analysis to identify dramatically mispriced corporate securities from the entire capital spectrum. GrizzlyRock Capital is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

Why Optimism Regarding Future Small-Cap Returns May Be Misplaced

January 9, 2024 in Best Ideas Conference, Letters

This article is authored by MOI Global instructor Brad Hathaway, managing partner at Far View Capital Management, based in Aspen, Colorado.

Brad is an instructor at Best Ideas 2024.

Investors in small capitalization stocks (small caps) are hoping that their suffering is finally ending. For the past several years, small cap indices have significantly underperformed large-cap indices as overall market performance has been increasingly driven by a few massive companies.

The Russell 2000, a US small cap index, has declined over 5% in 2023 and generated a +17% five-year return; a substantial gap to the 10% gain in 2023 and +69% five-year return generated by the large cap S&P 500. European small cap indices have also been weak with the MSCI Europe Small Cap declining 6% in 2023 and generating an +8% five-year return (in USD).[i]

As a result of this significant underperformance, investors have begun expecting mean reversion combined with low valuations to drive outperformance for small-caps. In the past month, I have seen headlines like “Small Cap Funds Are More Promising Than They Have Been in Years”; “The Case for US Small-Cap Stocks”; “Big Value Available in Small Cap Stocks”.[ii] This optimism has also been apparent in conversations I have had as many investors I respect are excited for the opportunity in small-caps. However, even though most of my investing career has been focused on small caps, I think blanket optimism for smaller stocks is dangerous. Here are three reasons why I think it is a mistake to invest blindly in small caps:

Pervasive Adverse Selection

The burdens (regulatory oversight, competitive disclosures, quarterly reporting) often outweigh the benefits of being public for small companies. As a board member of a small, publicly-listed company, I have seen these challenges firsthand.

Because of the unattractiveness of public markets, combined with significant availability of private capital, early-stage companies are going public later in their maturity cycle and small companies are going private more often. For example, the number of US-listed public companies has fallen over 50% from >8,000 in 1996 to 3,700 in 2023.[iii] As a result of these trends, the small companies that remain public are often those that do not have another option.

In many cases, if a public company has remained a small cap for a long time, then it is reasonable to assume some fundamental flaw in the business that has prevented it from successfully scaling to a larger size. Simple compounding suggests that a good small company should eventually graduate from being a small cap.

Because of this adverse selection, I am highly skeptical of any long-tenured small-cap unless I deeply understand why it is a public company and why its future will be dramatically different from the past (new management, new product, industry change etc.).

Inferior Businesses and Management Teams

It should not be surprising that smaller companies are generally weaker than their larger peers. As an example, at the end of 2022, 40% of the companies in the Russell 2000 were unprofitable and the S&P 500 has historically enjoyed double the profit margins of the S&P 600 (smaller cap).[iv]

Smaller businesses are also more fragile. A $5mln unforeseen expense is a much larger problem for a company with $25mln in cash flow than it would be for most S&P 500 constituents. Compounding this impact from unforeseen expenses, smaller companies also have fewer attractive financing options during periods of duress. As a result, smaller companies face greater likelihood of a one-off event forcing a dilutive financing that materially impacts shareholder value.

Smaller companies also frequently have weaker management teams. As ambitious people, it should not be surprising that CEOs tend to be higher quality at larger companies with more pay and greater resources.

Furthermore, smaller companies often suffer from a lack of management depth, leaving them far too reliant on one or two key executives. The reliance on key personnel materially increases the risk of smaller public companies as outside investors will not receive any advance warning of their departure. Executive turnover can remove critical knowledge and irreplaceable skills, seriously wounding a small business.

Unreliable Price Discovery

Active investment depends on finding undervalued companies with the belief that market participants will eventually recognize and correct that undervaluation. However, recent trends have damaged the price discovery process in small caps.

The increasing prevalence of passive index funds means that a large portion of a company’s ownership is not comprised of investors who have an opinion on a company’s fair value. At the end of 2022, passively managed strategies had increased to 46% of the US equity market, compared to 22% at the end of 2012. Furthermore, actively managed mutual funds have experienced $2.3 trillion of outflows from 2013 to 2022.[v]

Companies with high passive ownership have fewer independent analysts assessing their value. Therefore, their share prices are more influenced by macro factors including investor risk tolerance, sector fund flows, and index inclusion. As a result, individual company share prices can often be buffeted by factors well outside of their control and any mispricing can take longer to correct. Small caps have been heavily impacted by these trends as they have the largest percentage of the company owned by passive investors.[vi]

In small cap, this price discovery challenge has been exacerbated by the decline of sell-side research. As trading commissions have continued to decline, investment banks have invested fewer resources in quality research, especially for smaller companies with low trading liquidity. As a result, there are fewer sell-side analysts to help investors appropriately value small companies.

As a result of this lack of price discovery, my experience is that small caps generate long periods of underperformance followed (hopefully) by massive outperformance over a very short time. This persistent negative feedback causes significant discomfort for most investors, even when their small cap investments end up generating strong returns.

While carefully chosen small caps provide the potential for substantial returns, I believe it is critical to remember the structural headwinds that make this asset class difficult to invest in. A superficial approach to small cap investing is likely to generate a portfolio filled with subpar companies who remain undervalued longer than most investors are willing to wait.


[i] Data from Bloomberg 10/25/2018-10/25/2023; 12/30/22-10/25/23
[ii] Barrons, 10/6/2023, https://www.barrons.com/articles/small-cap-funds-buy-3f836365; BNP Paribas 9/29/23-
https://viewpoint.bnpparibas-am.com/the-case-for-us-small-cap-stocks/; ETFTrends.com 10/19/23-
https://www.etftrends.com/etf-building-blocks-channel/big-value-available-small-cap-stocks/

[iii] https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/09/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html;
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sprevearnmar.pdf

[iv] https://am.jpmorgan.com/us/en/asset-management/adv/insights/market-insights/market-updates/on-theminds-of-investors/is-there-an-opportunity-in-small-caps/
[v] https://www.ici.org/system/files/2023-05/2023-factbook.pdf; p. 22; 48
[vi] https://www.etf.com/sections/features-and-news/passive-funds-ownership-us-stockssoars#:~:text=The%20report%20noted%20that%20stocks,midcap%2C%20value%20and%20dividend%20funds.

If You Could Pick Twenty Stocks for Twenty Years, Which Would You Pick?

January 9, 2024 in Best Ideas Conference, Letters

This article is authored by MOI Global instructor Bogumil Baranowski, founding partner at Sicart Associates, based in New York.

Bogumil is an instructor at Best Ideas 2024.

Beyond temperament, investing is a lot about filters and mental models. A question I pondered this year would be a good example — if you could pick 20 stocks to hold for 20 years, what would you pick? You might think of the big and older brands and well-established businesses that stood the test of time because they might still be around in 20 years. It’s an intriguing strategy, but it is not exactly the question I had in mind. Let me explain.

A Mysterious Story of an Old Portfolio

I regularly review the accounts I manage, but recently, something really stood out. A smaller subset of stocks did all the heavy lifting, especially when I looked back at the last 5-10 or even 20 years.

As much as most accounts have similarities, there is one that stands out from one particular perspective. It’s an account where I did less selling and more holding due to the client’s preference. I let the proverbial winners run. The phenomenon I noticed was even more visible there since the account saw a rise in position sizes in about 20 holdings out of 50 or so. It’s no surprise that some didn’t keep up with the rest, too.

20 stocks is an interesting count since it’s also the number of holdings where most of the individual stock risk gets diversified away. Studies show that for large caps, the number is 15, and for small caps, 26. A 20-stock portfolio is also concentrated enough that each holding has enough weight to matter, and make a hopefully positive contribution.

Infinite Horizon, Finite Assets

An infinite investment horizon is usually the preferred time frame for the clients I am privileged to serve. The last thing they ever want to risk is losing everything and starting from scratch again. At the same time, they would like to see their wealth grow at a respectable rate over time.

This infinite investment horizon faces a serious challenge. The assets we invest in are finite. Businesses don’t last forever; even if they survive longer than average, their glory years are counted.

How finite are their lives? Studies show that, on average, successful companies have about 20 years at their peak. As much as the big-picture investment horizon is infinite, the preferred holding period for many stocks might be as much or as little as two decades then.

Who Can Wait That Long?

A year ago, I wrote an essay about a stock for a grandchild. I explained how it’s someone who can wait that long for the investment to fully play out. It’s not the only candidate for this kind of investing, though. More broadly defined, it’s the future being. A grandchild, a nephew, a niece — yes, of course, but it can be you, the future self.

Anyone who experiences sudden wealth or wants to put their nest egg to work for the long run can think of a 20-year investment horizon and choose investments accordingly. It allows them to focus on everything else: work, career, and new ventures, while a certain portion of the capital continues to grow with that 20-year horizon.

What Kind of a Stock Deserves a 20-Year Wait?

Big brands and big well-established businesses of today may well be around 20 years from now. U.S. Steel is still with us over a century later. It was once the first billion-dollar company, but a quick math will reveal that it wasn’t necessarily a good place to grow or even preserve wealth.

I emphasize the word deserve. I’m looking for a business that will use those 20 years to truly impress us. It has the potential to grow many times over, expand margins, generate cash flows, and, most of all, reinvest back in the business at respectable rates.

It needs long-term thinkers at the helm and a long runway ahead so that time works in our favor. It has to be already publicly traded and with enough history to prove that it has a winning formula and favorable odds of future success.

Why Wait 20 Years?

The power of compounding becomes visible when we wait. With respectable returns and a sufficiently long timeframe, even smaller sums are bound to grow to meaningful amounts.

If you look out 20 years, it’s easier to capture those 10x-100x stocks that many studies have researched before. Great companies become even bigger and better, but they need time, and not just a few quarters, but decades.

Finally, the 20-year time frame allows us to have a more relaxed attitude to any short-term market fluctuations, economic cycles, recessions, panics, and more. We keep asking if it’s something that matters if we are genuinely willing to wait that long.

Conclusion

20 stocks for 20 years is a thought experiment, a mental model, a helpful filter that I’ve been pondering for a while now. I notice how the moment you raise the bar and focus, the quality of the research and investment process rises, too. It’s also worth noting that with this approach, the competition for ideas might be slimmer than for a 3-5-year horizon and even more so than for 1-year or 1-quarter stock flipping contests.

I don’t imply here to pick 20 stocks and forget them; I think the world is subject to too much change to do that. Those holdings will require care and attention. Yet, if we intentionally look for those 20-year stocks, we are bound to come across some true long-term winners.

There will be lemons, there always are, but looking for stocks that deserve the wait for investors that are in a position to wait might be just the right mental model worth considering, especially if you are playing the long game, maybe even an infinite game.

The only immediate question that remains is, what’s a good example of such a stock?

Best Ideas 2024 Preview: Pharma Supplier Sartorius Stedim Biotech

January 7, 2024 in Best Ideas Conference, Letters

This article is authored by MOI Global instructor Frank Fischer, CEO and CIO of Shareholder Value Management AG, based in Frankfurt, Germany.

Frank is an instructor at Best Ideas 2024.

The approach is familiar from the times of the gold rush in California or Alaska: only a few of the gold prospectors were really successful in the end and an even smaller number became really rich. However, those who sold the equipment to the gold seekers – whether shovels or buckets – reliably earned good money and achieved considerable prosperity through steady yields without straining their luck.

Sartorius Stedim Biotech (France: DIM) belongs to the category of bucket and shovel sellers: it is an international provider of products and services that enable biopharmaceutical manufacturers to develop and manufacture medicines. The company focuses on single-use technologies and value-added services.

Biotechnology is a long-term trend for the future – but only a few companies are really taking off to a flying start with their new pharmaceutical products. The risks in this sector are therefore very high. On the other hand, the risks for producers of the necessary equipment can be assessed much better. For them, the success of product developments plays only a subordinate role. It is precisely in this category that Sartorius Stedim Biotech falls with its high-quality single-use technologies, without which no production in biotechnology can be successfully set up.

To understand Sartorius Stedim Biotech’s business model, we need to take a quick look at the drug development processes. Historically, drugs have been made by chemical synthesis, and the result has simply been molecules such as aspirin. These drugs act systemically, i.e. they act over the whole organism to achieve their goal. Undesirable side effects are inevitable. To stay with the example of aspirin: You fight the pain but risk a strain on the stomach mucous membranes.

For producers, the approach is fraught with risks. Many new drug candidates fail during clinical trials because, for example, the side effects are too harsh.

The next generation of drug production

In contrast to synthesis, fermentation can be used to produce much more complex molecular compounds. The advantage is that the active ingredient can be targeted much more specifically to the clinical picture, which means that higher dosages are possible. To put it simply, the core of fermentation is genetically modified cells that expel the active ingredient (i.e. the desired active ingredient) as part of the process.

This process has revolutionized drug manufacturing. The first significant successes were achieved in the biotechnological production of insulin in the mid-1990s. Instead of extracting the drug from the pancreas of cattle and pigs, an optimized E.coli bacterial culture has taken over the production in eight-meter-high fermenters with a capacity of 16,000 liters. These had to be cleaned after each production process. This was expensive and labor-intensive.

And that’s where Sartorius comes in. This is because Sartorius produces so-called single-use containers, in which fermentation can take place. This has three advantages: the production process is cheaper, more flexible and even faster.

Single-use container Sartorius Stedim Biotech

The older steel-tank bioreactors had a volume of up to 20,000 liters. Such sizes may be useful for the production of so-called blockbuster drugs such as insulin. But the requirements are changing. Today, an increasing number of small and medium-sized biotechnology companies are developing more and more specific biologics for the different subtypes of diseases. Due to the increasing individualization of therapies, the addressable group of patients is getting smaller and smaller. As a result, the big cauldrons of the “blockbuster” generation are becoming less and less of an option. Instead, small containers, such as the single-use containers with a capacity of up to 5,000 litres, are an advantage.

There is no question that Sartorius CEO Joachim Kreuzburg played a decisive role in this development. Until entering the new segment of single-use containers, Sartorius was primarily active in the field of precision scales. Kreuzburg is a salaried CEO, but he also owns small shares in the company. The ownership structure is about to undergo a major change. Until now, the family’s shares have been held by a lawyer as administrator of the last will and testament of Horst Sartorius, the grandson of the company’s founder. After that, these shares will pass into the hands of the family. Since it is more than 50 percent, it will have a greater significance. It is then quite possible that Sartorius will be taken over by a competitor such as Thermofisher from the USA.

Natural oligopoly protects against new competitors

The bioprocessing market has historically grown at a rate of 12 percent per year. Currently, the growth rate has fallen to just 10 percent. However, many experts believe that the market will return to its historical growth rate.

At the same time, the barriers to market entry in this innovative business area are very high – and protect the existing suppliers in a kind of natural oligopoly. The most important factor is the approval of new drugs. When new drugs come onto the market, manufacturers also look at the production processes from phase III onwards in the development process at the latest. This is where the different filters and membranes come into play. The production method is approved by the regulatory authority and is not changed after a successful approval.

As a rule, these processes are then protected and completely fixed for periods of 10 to 12 years. And this is exactly where pharmaceutical manufacturers rely on the well-known names in the industry such as Sartorius, Thermofisher or Danaher.

“One stop shop” gives pricing power

If a new supplier, for example in the field of filters, has an innovative product, the probability that the major drug manufacturers will use such a product is still low, because there are still many other aids missing. In this respect, the few producers who have been able to position themselves on the market as a “one-stop shop” are very well protected from new competition. Innovative niche providers prefer to be taken over by them rather than look for competition in the long term. This market structure allows the industry leaders to have very good pricing power and forms an economic moat.

Innovations are now driving this sector and the next forms of therapy, cell and gene therapies, are already in the starting blocks. This area has a growth potential of 20 to 30 percent per year. With a recent acquisition of Polyplus, Sartorius Stedim Biotech is already well positioned to be part of this new basic technology.

Victim of success

The company became a bit of a victim of its own success here. During the Corona pandemic, it was a matter of getting the essential consumables at all for a longer period of time, after the vaccine manufacturers had reduced inventories in the market to almost zero. In the tense supply situation, many pharmaceutical companies built up high inventories in order to be able to continue production in any case. From 2021 to mid-2022, there were above-average growth rates and a special boom in the share. After that, the pendulum swung back: less vaccine was produced and at the same time many pharmaceutical producers still had high inventories. Since Sartorius Stedim Biotech has proven to be a particularly reliable supplier during the crisis, the company is more affected by the reduction in inventories than its competitors.

Recovery after sharp price correction

For the 2023 financial year, management now expects a 19% decline in revenue after two profit warnings. In addition, the 2025 targets have been reduced. This has led to a sharp correction in the stock. However, initial data points show that destocking is coming to an end. At the same time, underlying growth remains strong, precisely because of the long-term trends outlined above. We believe that with the new medium-term targets to be released by management in January 2024, the focus will shift back towards the company’s long-term potential. At the same time, order intake should also improve again with each quarter. The low point here was the third quarter of 2023, according to consistent statements by several management teams in the industry. That’s why we’re betting on a recovery of the stock in 2024.

Christopher Tsai and Peter C. Keefe on Long-Term Outperformance

January 6, 2024 in Audio, Diary, Equities, Featured, Invest Intelligently Podcast, Latticework, Latticework New York, Member Podcasts, Podcast, Transcripts

Christopher Tsai, President and Chief Investment Officer of Tsai Capital Corporation, led a conversation with great investor and thinker Peter C. Keefe, Principal Manager of Avenir Corporation. Peter has quietly amassed one of the most impressive long-term track records in the business.

Christopher and Peter joined the MOI Global community at Latticework 2023, held at the Yale Club of New York City on December 12.

This conversation is available as an episode of Invest Intelligently, a member podcast of MOI Global. (Learn how to access member podcasts.)

Members, log in below to access the restricted content.

Not a member?

Thank you for your interest.  Please note that MOI Global is closed to new members at this time. If you would like to join the waiting list, complete the following form:

About the session host:

Christopher Tsai is President and Chief Investment Officer of Tsai Capital, an investment management firm focused on the long-term growth and preservation of capital on behalf of select families and organizations. With more than two decades of experience, and as a third-generation investor whose financial roots date back to World War II, he leads the firm’s investment activities and is Chairperson of the firm’s advisory committee. Christopher pursues a value-oriented investment approach and seeks high-quality, growth companies that offer significant upside potential and a margin of safety at the time of purchase. He utilizes a multidisciplinary approach to identify companies that he believes have a sustainable competitive advantage and can compound earnings at an above-average rate over the long-term. Companies in his portfolio tend to have strong balance sheets, a history of producing high rates of return on capital, and a culture of innovation. Christopher’s investment approach has been most influenced by Warren Buffett, Philip Fisher and Charlie Munger, as well as by his grandmother and father, the late investor and philanthropist Gerald Tsai Jr. who was the first Chinese-American to lead a Dow Jones Industrial company. Christopher’s financial roots date back to World War II, as his grandmother, Ruth Tsai, was the first woman to trade shares on the floor of the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Christopher has written for Wealth Management Magazine about investing in durable, long-term trends, and for Investment & Pensions Europe about investing in art as an alternative asset class. He is also the author of “Back Door to China”, which was published in Worth Magazine. Prior to forming Tsai Capital, Christopher was an equity analyst at Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., John A. Levin & Co., Inc., and Gabelli Asset Management. Christopher has been a benefactor of numerous museums and cultural institutions, both nationally and internationally, and is the world’s foremost collector of works by contemporary artist Ai Weiwei. When not looking at businesses, he loves running in nature, quiet time with his books and family, submersing himself in the arts and a perfectly steeped pot of tea. Christopher is a member of the CFA Society New York and received a Bachelor of Arts degree in philosophy and international politics from Middlebury College, where he served on the Middlebury College Arts Council.

About the guest speaker:

Peter C. Keefe has managed client portfolios at Avenir since 1991. Prior to joining Avenir, Peter worked with Johnston, Lemon & Company, a New York Stock Exchange Member Firm, where he served in several capacities, including Director of Research. Peter received a B.A. from Washington & Lee University in 1978, and formerly sat on its Board of Trustees. He is a CFA Charterholder, a former Director of the Washington Society of Investment Analysts, and a member of the CFA Society of Washington, D.C.

MOI Global